Milos Mikovic vs Thomas Patton Estadísticas cara a cara, resultados y comparación de rendimiento
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W W L L W L
Form
L L L L L L L L W LCara A Cara: Mikovic 1 - 0 Patton
Ellas han jugado 3 conjuntos en total, con Mikovic victoriosa 2 y Patton victoriosa 1. El último partido entre Mikovic y Patton fue en el M15 Kursumlijska Banja, el 20-05-2024, Cuartos de Q2 round, Clay, con Milos Mikovic obteniendo la victoria 7-6(6) 4-6 10-4
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Milos Mikovic | 1 |
| Thomas Patton | 0 |
M15 Kursumlijska Banja(20-05-2024)
7
6
4
6
10
4
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sakkari VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Shelton VS Mensik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| GANADOR | PERDEDOR | MARCADOR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(6) 4-6 10-4 | |||||
| Estadísticas | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Partidos cara a cara | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Ganados | 1 |
| 21 | Juegos Ganados | 16 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Faltas dobles totales | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Tiempo promedio de partido | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | % De Primer Servicio | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | % De Pts Ganados Con 1st Serv. | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | % De Pts Ganados Con 2nd Serv. | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Puntos de quiebre ganados % (total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | % de ganancia de puntos devueltos | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | La mejor de 3 sets gana % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | La mejor de 5 sets gana % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | % de victorias en desempates (total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | % De Sets Decisivos Ganados | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1er set ganado, partido ganado | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1er set ganado, partido perdido | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1er set perdido, partido ganado | 0% (1/0) |
Las estadísticas mostradas actualmente incluyen partidos de todos los niveles. Para excluir eventos de nivel inferior (según las estadísticas oficiales de ATP / WTA), usa el botón de alternar en el pie de página.
Partidos Recientes Jugados Por Milos Mikovic
Before:
| OPONENTE | MARCADOR | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Piotr Pawlak
Player
Milos Mikovic
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
9
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-2 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Zoran Ludoski
Player
Milos Mikovic
82%
(
45 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Leon Peranovic
Player
Milos Mikovic
50%
(
38 of
76)
1st Serve %
58%
(
48 of
83)
5
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
3
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
82
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(4) 4-6 10-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 3-6 6-1 10-6 | H2H | |||
Ver Más
Partidos Recientes Jugados Por Thomas Patton
Before:
| OPONENTE | MARCADOR | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Joshua Charlton
Player
Thomas Patton
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
5
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
17 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
25 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thomas Patton
Player
Mattias Southcombe
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
28 of
34)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
29 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
19 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 6-3 11-9 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Rae
Player
Thomas Patton
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Oscar Weightman
Player
Thomas Patton
46%
(
27 of
59)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexis Canter
Player
Thomas Patton
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Rae
Player
Thomas Patton
53%
(
39 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
3
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
34 of
45)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
23 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-2 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-1 10-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Thomas Patton
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Ver Más
Desglose De Estadísticas Contra Todos Los Oponentes H2H
| Estadísticas | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (36/25) | Win/Loss | 48% (31/34) |
| 57% (80/60) | Sets Win/Loss | 45% (68/82) |
| 53% (725/649) | Games Win/Loss | 48% (740/803) |
| 54% (7/6) | Hard Win/Loss | 40% (14/21) |
| 61% (28/18) | Clay Win/Loss | 52% (11/10) |
| 50% (1/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 67% (6/3) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 53 | Aces Total | 106 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.08 |
| 88 | Total Double Faults | 61 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 147.23 | Average Opponent Rank | 173.42 |
| 63% (1033/1630) | 1st Serve % | 65% (969/1502) |
| 61% (633/1033) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (636/969) |
| 47% (281/597) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (242/533) |
| 48% (68/143) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 36% (36/101) |
| 40% (636/1575) | Return Points Win % | 33% (453/1353) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (36/25) | Futures W/L | 48% (31/34) |
| 58% (35/60) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 48% (31/65) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 58% (7/12) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 31% (4/13) |
| 47% (9/19) | Deciding Set Win % | 70% (14/20) |
| 83% (40/33) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (28/24) |
| 18% (40/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (28/4) |
| 10% (21/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (37/7) |
Otras predicciones
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
Si buscas predecir partidos de tenis o fútbol, ¡Matchstat.com lo tiene cubierto! Tenemos estadísticas de ligas, jugadores y equipos, y nos especializamos en estadísticas detalladas h2h entre jugadores de tenis o equipos de fútbol.
Todas nuestras predicciones se basan en el aprendizaje automático y la inteligencia artificial. Matchstat está diseñado para ayudarte en tus análisis y predicciones, pero la responsabilidad de tus predicciones finales es tuya.
Es bueno hablar... Ponte en contacto con nosotros [email protected]
